GK Questions

Filter by category, type, and difficulty. Reading is open for everyone.

Showing 941–960 of 1405 questions
polity medium true_false

Under Article 270, taxes levied and collected by the Union but distributed between Union and States include income tax (excluding agricultural income) and corporation tax, with distribution per Finance Commission recommendations balancing equity and efficiency.

  1. True
  2. False
polity medium true_false

Zonal Councils, established under the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, are statutory (not constitutional) bodies that promote inter-State cooperation on economic, social, and administrative issues within regions, complementing constitutional federal mechanisms.

  1. True
  2. False
polity medium true_false

Under Article 154, the executive power of the State is vested in the Governor and exercised by him directly or through officers subordinate to him, but in practice, this power is exercised by the Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister, with Governor acting on their aid and advice under Article 163.

  1. True
  2. False
polity medium true_false

Under Article 256, States are obligated to exercise their executive power to ensure compliance with Union laws, and the Union can give directions to States for this purpose, reflecting cooperative federalism in administrative relations.

  1. True
  2. False
polity medium true_false

In Supriyo v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court directed the Central Government to constitute a high-level committee to examine rights and entitlements of queer couples, illustrating how courts can facilitate rights protection through institutional mechanisms while respecting legislative domain.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court recognized human dignity as foundational principle underlying Fundamental Rights, and held that discrimination based on sexual orientation violates dignity under Article 21.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Supriyo v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court's decision to decline legalizing same-sex marriage while affirming queer rights exemplifies separation of powers: courts protect constitutional values but defer complex policy design to legislature.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court emphasized that Constitutional Morality requires the State to protect minorities and individuals against majoritarian impulses, ensuring that democratic legitimacy respects constitutional limits, not just popular will.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Supriyo v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court recognized that constitutional rights like non-discrimination, dignity, and autonomy under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 protect queer couples even without legislative recognition of same-sex marriage, demonstrating that rights protection is not contingent on specific institutional recognition.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court interpreted 'sex' in Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination) to include sexual orientation and gender identity, ensuring that discrimination based on these grounds violates constitutional guarantees of equality.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Supriyo v. Union of India (2023), despite declining to legalize same-sex marriage, the Supreme Court affirmed that queer couples have constitutional rights to protection from discrimination, right to cohabit, and access to services without discrimination, demonstrating that rights protection can occur even without legislative recognition of specific institutions like marriage.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court held that sexual orientation is intrinsic to personality, and discrimination based on sexual orientation violates constitutional guarantees of dignity, equality, and liberty under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21.

  1. True
  2. False
polity medium true_false

In Supriyo v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court directed the Central Government to constitute a high-level committee to examine rights and entitlements of queer couples, including issues like joint bank accounts, medical decision-making, and social security benefits.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by striking down Section 377 IPC, holding that constitutional values of dignity, equality, and liberty under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 protect LGBTQ+ rights against majoritarian social morality.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Supreme Court emphasized that Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are complementary and harmonious, with FRs providing means and DPSP providing ends for establishing an egalitarian society, and neither can be given absolute primacy over the other.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Supriyo v. Union of India (2023), despite declining to legalize same-sex marriage, the Supreme Court affirmed that queer couples have constitutional rights to protection from discrimination, right to cohabit, and access to services without discrimination under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court held that Constitutional Morality (constitutional values of dignity, equality, liberty) must prevail over social morality (majoritarian views) when they conflict in matters affecting fundamental rights.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Supreme Court held that Parliament's amending power under Article 368 is limited, and amendments that destroy the basic structure of the Constitution are unconstitutional, reinforcing the principle that constitutional supremacy prevails over parliamentary sovereignty.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020), the Supreme Court applied the proportionality test to internet shutdowns, requiring that restrictions on digital free speech be published, time-bound, subject to judicial review, and necessary for legitimate aims like national security.

  1. True
  2. False
polity hard true_false

In Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court struck down Section 497 IPC (adultery) as violating gender equality under Articles 14, 15, and dignity/autonomy under Article 21, holding that marital relationships must be based on mutual respect, not ownership.

  1. True
  2. False