Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizPick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizNo weekly quiz is published yet. Check the weekly page for the latest updates.
View Weekly PageFree practice for SSC, UPSC, Banking & Railway exams. No login required.
Answer: 104th Amendment, 2019
104th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019: (a) Extended SC/ST reservation in Lok Sabha/Assemblies till 2030, (b) Omitted Article 331 (Anglo-Indian nomination to Lok Sabha) and Article 333 (Anglo-Indian nomination to State Assemblies). Rationale: Anglo-Indian community's distinct identity has diminished; reservation based on social/educational backwardness principle. Controversial but constitutionally valid.
Answer: Two-thirds of members present and voting
Article 312(1): Rajya Sabha can pass resolution by 2/3 of members present and voting declaring it expedient in national interest to create new All India Services common to Union and States. Currently three AIS: IAS, IPS, IFoS. Proposed: Indian Forest Service already exists; Indian Judicial Service, Indian Education Service debated. Enables national-level administrative cadre while respecting federal structure.
Answer: Balanced pluralism: promoting Hindi while protecting linguistic diversity and regional identities
Constitutional language/regional framework: (a) Promotes Hindi as Union official language (Article 343, 351) while allowing English continuation (Official Languages Act), (b) Recognizes 22 Eighth Schedule languages, (c) Allows States to adopt official languages (Article 345), (d) Grants special provisions to tribal/regionally distinct States (Articles 371 series, Fifth/Sixth Schedules). Balances national integration with respect for diversity; pragmatic pluralism as constitutional philosophy.
Answer: All were added together in 2003
92nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003: Added four languages to Eighth Schedule simultaneously: Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali. Total languages now 22. Inclusion criteria: literary heritage, distinct script, significant speaker population, cultural identity. No fixed procedure; added via constitutional amendment based on political consensus and linguistic advocacy.
Answer: 1
Article 371F (Sikkim): Special provisions on merger: (a) Protection of existing laws, (b) Land ownership rights for Sikkimese, (c) Reservation in government jobs/education, (d) 1 Lok Sabha seat, (e) 1 Rajya Sabha seat. Balances integration with Union while protecting Sikkim's unique identity, culture, and demographic concerns.
Answer: 5
Article 344(1): President to constitute Official Language Commission: (a) After 5 years from Constitution commencement (1955 Commission), (b) Thereafter at 10-year intervals. Commission examines: progress in Hindi use, restrictions on English, promotion of Hindi, representation of Eighth Schedule languages. Recommendations guide language policy evolution.
Answer: inter-State
Article 131: SC has exclusive original jurisdiction in federal disputes including inter-State boundary disputes. Many boundary disputes (e.g., Belagavi between Karnataka-Maharashtra) have linguistic dimensions. SC adjudicates based on: historical evidence, administrative convenience, linguistic affinity, people's wishes. Balances legal principles with socio-political realities in federal disputes.
Answer: Composite culture of India
Article 351: Union duty to promote Hindi development to serve as medium of expression for composite culture of India; secure richness by assimilating elements from Hindustani and other Eighth Schedule languages; draw vocabulary primarily from Sanskrit, secondarily from other languages. Balances Hindi promotion with linguistic diversity and cultural synthesis.
Answer: Prime Minister of India
Section 4, Official Languages Act, 1963: Committee on Official Language comprises 30 MPs (20 from Lok Sabha, 10 from Rajya Sabha); chaired by Prime Minister. Reviews progress in use of Hindi for official Union purposes, makes recommendations. Ensures parliamentary oversight of language policy implementation while promoting Hindi progressively.
Answer: Eighth
Article 120: Parliamentary business in Hindi/English; members may speak in any Eighth Schedule language with presiding officer's permission. Similar provision for State Legislatures under Article 210. Ensures linguistic diversity in legislative proceedings while maintaining efficiency through common official languages.
Answer: Hindi
Article 343(1): Official language of Union is Hindi in Devanagari script. International form of Indian numerals to be used for official purposes. However, Article 343(2) allowed English to continue for 15 years (till 1965) for official Union purposes. Official Languages Act, 1963 extended English indefinitely alongside Hindi for practical administration.
Answer: Curb opportunistic defections while allowing genuine ideological shifts
Tenth Schedule aims to: (a) Prevent horse-trading and unstable governments by curbing individual/small-group defections for personal gain, (b) Allow genuine realignments via merger exception (2/3 rule), (c) Maintain party discipline on critical votes while respecting dissent through condonation provision. Balance between stability and flexibility; ongoing reforms debated to address implementation gaps like Speaker bias and delayed decisions.
Answer: Right to Information (implicit in Article 19)
Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (2024): 5-judge bench unanimously struck down Electoral Bonds Scheme (2018) holding: (a) Anonymous political funding violates voters' right to know (implicit in Article 19(1)(a)), (b) Disproportionate impact on transparency, (c) Potential for quid pro quo corruption. Directed ECI to disclose bond donor-recipient details. Landmark transparency judgment.
Answer: Keisham Meghachandra Singh case (2020)
Keisham Meghachandra Singh v. Hon'ble Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly (2020): SC held Speaker must decide Tenth Schedule petitions within reasonable time (suggested 3 months); unreasonable delay undermines law's efficacy. Court can intervene if delay causes irreversible harm. Highlighted need for parliamentary amendment to fix timeframe; reform still pending.
Answer: ₹20,000
Section 29B, R.P. Act: Political parties can accept donations; donations above ₹20,000 must be reported to ECI with donor details. Electoral Bonds Scheme (2018-2024) allowed anonymous donations via banks, but Supreme Court struck it down in 2024 (Association for Democratic Reforms case) citing transparency and right to information. Ongoing debate on political funding reforms.
Answer: No, no specific time limit
Tenth Schedule doesn't prescribe time limit for Speaker's decision on disqualification petitions. Supreme Court in Keisham Meghachandra Singh case (2020) recommended Parliament amend Schedule to specify timeframe (e.g., 3 months) except in exceptional cases. Delayed decisions undermine anti-defection law's deterrent effect; reform pending.
Answer: 15 days
Paragraph 2(1)(b) proviso: If member votes/abstains contrary to whip without prior permission, disqualification can be avoided if party condones the act within 15 days. Condonation must be explicit; implied approval insufficient. This allows parties flexibility to handle genuine dissent while maintaining discipline on critical votes.
Answer: Speaker/Chairman
Paragraph 6(1) of Tenth Schedule: Speaker of Lok Sabha/State Assembly or Chairman of Rajya Sabha/State Council decides disqualification petitions. Their decision is subject to judicial review (Kihoto Hollohan case, 1992). Controversy exists over Speaker's impartiality when belonging to ruling party; reforms debated to transfer power to independent tribunal.
Answer: two-thirds
Paragraph 4 of Tenth Schedule: Merger exception - disqualification doesn't apply if original party merges with another party, OR if not less than 2/3 of members of legislature party agree to merge. This allows genuine ideological realignments while preventing small-group defections. 91st Amendment removed 'split' exception (1/3 rule) to curb defections.
Answer: Tenth Schedule
Tenth Schedule was inserted by the 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1985 to curb political defections. It contains provisions for disqualification of members of Parliament and State Legislatures on grounds of defection. Aimed at promoting political stability and preventing horse-trading in legislatures.