GK Question

polity hard mcq

Despite ongoing debate about reforming judicial appointments, which mechanism continues to govern appointments of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts as of 2024?

  1. National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC)
  2. Collegium system (judges appointing judges)
  3. Executive appointment with Parliamentary approval
  4. Independent Judicial Appointments Commission

Answer: Collegium system (judges appointing judges)

Judicial appointments status (2024): (a) NJAC struck down: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015): 4:1 majority struck down 99th Amendment and NJAC Act, (b) Collegium system continues: (i) SC appointments: CJI + 4 senior-most SC judges recommend names, (ii) HC appointments: CJ of HC + 2 senior-most HC judges recommend, (iii) President normally appoints based on collegium recommendations, (c) Ongoing debate: Criticisms (lack of transparency, delays causing vacancies) vs. counter-arguments (executive role risks political interference), (d) Reforms proposed: Secretariat to assist collegium, published criteria, fixed timelines, limited executive input without veto. Illustrates tension between judicial independence and accountability; no consensus yet on reform model.

Topic Judicial Appointments - Collegium Developments
Exam Relevance Judicial appointments mechanism critical for UPSC Mains and Judiciary exams