Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizGK Question
Contemporary challenges like pandemics, climate disasters, and hybrid threats test India's Emergency framework. Which approach best aligns with constitutional principles?
- Automatic invocation of Constitutional Emergency for any major crisis
- Exhaust ordinary legal frameworks first; invoke Constitutional Emergency only as last resort for existential threats, with strict safeguards
- Delegate all crisis response to States without Union coordination
- Suspend judicial review during any crisis for swift executive action
Answer: Exhaust ordinary legal frameworks first; invoke Constitutional Emergency only as last resort for existential threats, with strict safeguards
Emergency powers contemporary application framework: (a) Subsidiarity principle: Use ordinary laws first (Disaster Management Act, Epidemic Diseases Act, security legislation, environmental laws); Constitutional Emergency only if ordinary frameworks insufficient for existential threat to constitutional order, (b) Proportionality: Measures must be rationally connected to threat, least restrictive alternative, benefits outweigh rights restrictions, (c) Safeguards: (i) Written Cabinet advice, (ii) Parliamentary approval within time limits, (iii) Judicial review for constitutional compliance, (iv) Non-suspendable core rights (Articles 20-21), (v) Federal coordination through existing mechanisms (NDRF, NDMA, GST Council), (d) Temporariness: Emergency measures temporary; clear exit strategy to restore normal constitutional functioning, (e) Democratic accountability: Legislature can revoke Emergency; citizens can challenge misuse through courts; media/civil society monitor implementation. Illustrates constitutional wisdom: Emergency powers as shield for democracy, not sword against it; calibrated response preserving rights while addressing crisis. Essential for UPSC Mains analytical answers.