GK Question

polity hard mcq

In Supriyo v. Union of India (October 2023), the Supreme Court declined to legalize same-sex marriage, holding that:

  1. Marriage is a fundamental right under Article 21
  2. Recognition of same-sex marriage is within Parliament's domain, not judiciary
  3. Same-sex couples have no constitutional protection
  4. The Special Marriage Act is unconstitutional

Answer: Recognition of same-sex marriage is within Parliament's domain, not judiciary

Supriyo judgment (2023): 5-judge Constitution Bench (3:2 on key issues) held: (a) No fundamental right to marry under Constitution (though marriage protected under personal laws), (b) Recognition of same-sex marriage involves complex policy considerations (adoption, succession, maintenance) best left to Parliament, (c) However, affirmed rights of queer couples: protection from discrimination, right to cohabit, access to services without discrimination, (d) Directed government to form committee to examine rights/entitlements of queer couples. Balances judicial restraint with rights protection; ongoing legislative debate.

Topic LGBTQ+ Rights - Same-Sex Marriage Case
Exam Relevance Recent same-sex marriage case critical for UPSC Mains and current affairs exams