In which case did the Supreme Court hold that right to dignity is intrinsic to Article 21 and forms part of the basic structure of the Constitution?
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
- Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
- Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)
- All of the above
Answer: All of the above
Right to dignity jurisprudence: (a) Maneka Gandhi (1978): Expanded Article 21 to include due process; dignity implicit in fair procedure, (b) Puttaswamy (2017): Dignity intrinsic to privacy and liberty; foundational value for fundamental rights, (c) Navtej Singh Johar (2018): Dignity requires respect for sexual orientation; discrimination violates Article 14/15/21, (d) Applications: Decriminalization of homosexuality, transgender rights, rehabilitation of victims, prison reforms. Dignity as interpretive lens: Rights interpreted to enhance human worth, autonomy, respect.