Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizGK Question
In Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006), the Supreme Court struck down Bihar Assembly dissolution under Article 356, holding that the Governor's report recommending President's Rule was based on unverified media reports and political considerations, not ______ assessment of constitutional breakdown.
- subjective
- objective
- confidential
- partisan
Answer: objective
Rameshwar Prasad (2006) Governor's report and objective material: (a) Context: Bihar Assembly elections 2005 resulted in hung Assembly; Governor recommended President's Rule citing horse-trading based on media reports, without floor test, (b) Supreme Court holding: (i) Governor's satisfaction must be based on objective material, not unverified media reports or political considerations, (ii) Floor test is primary method to test majority; Governor cannot pre-empt Assembly's right to test majority, (iii) Dissolution of Assembly is extreme step; revival possible if proclamation invalidated, (c) SR Bommai reinforcement: (i) Presidential satisfaction subject to judicial review, (ii) Floor test as democratic standard for majority verification, (iii) Secularism part of basic structure; State action against secularism can justify Article 356, (iv) Assembly dissolution not automatic; can be revived if proclamation struck down, (d) Applications: (i) Recent Governor cases (2022-2024): Reiterated objective standards for Article 356 invocation, (ii) Federal balance: Protects State autonomy against Centre overreach via gubernatorial discretion, (e) Rationale: (i) Democratic legitimacy: Elected representatives, not appointed Governor, decide government fate, (ii) Constitutional morality: Governor as constitutional functionary, not political agent, (iii) Judicial oversight: Courts ensure Article 356 used for genuine constitutional breakdown, not political ends, (f) Illustrates constitutional federalism: Judicial review as guardian of federal balance; objective standards protect State autonomy within unified framework.