In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), the Supreme Court held that:
- Tribunals can completely replace High Courts in exercising judicial review
- Decisions of tribunals established under Articles 323A/323B are subject to judicial review by High Courts/Supreme Court; ouster clauses cannot exclude constitutional courts' jurisdiction
- Parliament can exclude judicial review of tribunal decisions by simple majority
- Tribunals have unlimited power to interpret constitutional provisions without judicial oversight
Answer: Decisions of tribunals established under Articles 323A/323B are subject to judicial review by High Courts/Supreme Court; ouster clauses cannot exclude constitutional courts' jurisdiction
- Chandra Kumar (1997) tribunal jurisdiction and judicial review: (a) Context: Challenge to administrative tribunals established under Articles 323A (Central Administrative Tribunal), 323B (State tribunals) with ouster clauses excluding High Court jurisdiction, (b) Supreme Court holding (7-judge bench): (i) Tribunals' decisions subject to judicial review by High Courts under Article 226/227 and Supreme Court under Article 32, (ii) Ouster clauses cannot exclude constitutional courts' jurisdiction; judicial review part of basic structure, (iii) Tribunals serve as first appellate forum; High Courts exercise supervisory jurisdiction, not routine appellate review, (c) Applications: (i) Tribunal decisions: Subject to HC/SC review for jurisdictional errors, violation of natural justice, constitutional principles, (ii) Ouster clauses: Cannot completely exclude judicial review; courts retain power to examine constitutional compliance, (iii) Separation of powers: Tribunals handle specialized disputes; constitutional courts ensure constitutional supremacy, (d) Rationale: (i) Constitutional supremacy: Judicial review ensures Constitution, not transient majorities, supreme, (ii) Rights protection: Judicial review essential for enforcing Fundamental Rights against state excess, (iii) Accountability: Ensures government accountable to Constitution, not arbitrary power, (e) Illustrates basic structure protection: Judicial review as unamendable core; amendment power cannot destroy mechanism ensuring constitutional compliance, rights protection, governmental accountability.