Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizGK Question
Freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) for hate speech, and courts apply ______ test to balance free speech with prevention of discrimination, violence against marginalized groups.
- Wednesbury
- proportionality
- rational basis
- strict scrutiny
Answer: proportionality
Hate speech regulation and proportionality: (a) Article 19(1)(a): Freedom of speech and expression, (b) Article 19(2): Reasonable restrictions for defamation, incitement to offence, public order, decency, morality, etc., (c) Proportionality application to hate speech: (i) Legitimate aim: Prevention of discrimination, violence against marginalized groups (based on religion, caste, gender, sexual orientation), (ii) Rational connection: Restrictions on hate speech suitable to achieve aim of preventing harm, (iii) Necessity: Less restrictive alternatives preferred (counter-speech, education vs. criminalization), (iv) Balancing: Benefits of preventing harm vs. harm to free speech, public discourse, (d) Applications: (i) Legal provisions: Sections 153A, 295A IPC criminalize hate speech; courts scrutinize charges to prevent misuse against legitimate dissent, (ii) Social media regulation: Platforms required to remove hate speech while preserving legitimate expression; transparency, appeal mechanisms essential, (iii) Educational measures: Counter-speech, media literacy as less restrictive alternatives to criminalization, (e) Challenges: (i) Definition: Defining hate speech precisely to avoid overbreadth, chilling effect on legitimate expression, (ii) Enforcement: Ensuring laws not misused to suppress dissent, target marginalized voices, (iii) Awareness: Public informed about hate speech laws, rights, redressal mechanisms, (f) Illustrates calibrated rights balancing: Free speech essential for democracy; proportionality ensures hate speech restrictions justified, not arbitrary, preserving democratic discourse while protecting marginalized groups.