Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizGK Question
Freedom of assembly under Article 19(1)(b) is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(3) for public order, and courts apply proportionality test to balance protest rights with security concerns, requiring restrictions to be least intrusive and time-bound.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Freedom of assembly and proportionality: (a) Article 19(1)(b): Right to assemble peaceably and without arms, (b) Article 19(3): Reasonable restrictions in interest of sovereignty, integrity, security of State, public order, (c) Proportionality application: (i) Legitimate aim: Public order, security, prevention of violence, (ii) Rational connection: Restrictions (e.g., designated protest zones, time limits) must be suitable to achieve aim, (iii) Necessity: Less restrictive alternatives preferred (dialogue, negotiation vs. blanket bans), (iv) Balancing: Benefits of restriction vs. harm to free speech, democratic participation, (d) Applications: (i) Protest regulation: Guidelines for permits, routes, duration to balance assembly rights with public order, (ii) Internet shutdowns: Anuradha Bhasin (2020) required publication, time-bound orders, judicial review for shutdowns affecting digital assembly, (iii) Police powers: Directions for proportionate use of force, protection of peaceful protesters, (e) Challenges: (i) Implementation gaps: Arbitrary restrictions, excessive force against protesters, (ii) Awareness: Citizens, police need training on assembly rights, procedures, (iii) Political will: Ensuring restrictions justified, not used to suppress dissent, (f) Illustrates calibrated rights balancing: Freedom of assembly essential for democracy; proportionality ensures restrictions justified, not arbitrary, preserving democratic space while maintaining public order.