economics hard MCQ

In Game Theory, the 'Prisoner's Dilemma' is a classic scenario that demonstrates why two completely rational individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interest to do so, often leading to:

  1. A Pareto optimal outcome for both
  2. A suboptimal Nash Equilibrium where both parties end up worse off
  3. A zero-sum game with a clear winner and loser
  4. A perfectly competitive market structure

Answer: A suboptimal Nash Equilibrium where both parties end up worse off

The Prisoner's Dilemma illustrates the conflict between individual rationality and collective benefit. Because each player acts out of self-interest and fear of being exploited by the other, they both choose to defect (e.g., confessing to a crime or starting a price war). This results in a Nash Equilibrium that is strictly worse for both compared to if they had successfully cooperated.

Topic Microeconomics - Game Theory
Exam Relevance UPSC Prelims, SSC CGL